duilawyerskokie.com (847) 568-0160

Under 725 ILCS 5/103-3.5, you have the right to make three phone calls free of charge with an attorney of your choice and members of your family within three hours of arrival at the first place of detention. You must be given access to a telephone to make the calls. If you are moved to a new place of detention, your right to make three calls within three hours of arrival is renewed.

If police violate these rights, your statements to them are presumed inadmissible as evidence. However, the state may overcome this presumption by showing that your statement was voluntarily given and is reliable based on the totality of the circumstances. The court may consider whether police knowingly prevented or delayed your right to communicate or failed to comply with the law’s requirements.

The three-hour rule does not apply if you are asleep, unconscious or otherwise incapacitated or if an exigent circumstance prevents police from complying. Exigent circumstances include threats to safety. The police report must then document the exigent circumstance. Once the exigent circumstance ends, the right to make three phone calls within three hours resumes.

The police must display a notice of your right to the three calls and must display the public defender’s phone number, where available.  Police must maintain records of the number of calls you made, when you made them, and any reason if you did not make thecalls.

Prior to 1/1/22, police could hold you a “reasonable time” before allowing you to make phone calls.

If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com.

(Besides Skokie, Matt Keenan also serves the communities of Arlington Heights, Chicago, Deerfield, Des Plaines, Evanston, Glenview, Morton Grove, Mount Prospect, Niles, Northbrook, Park Ridge, Rolling Meadows, Wilmette and Winnetka.)

Under limited circumstances, the answer is yes.

Breathalyzer results on a properly certified machine are nearly always admissible at trial.  However, results from a portable breathalyzer are not considered reliable and are generally not permitted. The breathalyzer taken on the street when you were arrested is almost never admitted as evidence.

But there is one exception. The state has a new weapon that they can use in certain circumstances. The trial judge may allow the state to use the results of a portable breathalyzer that has an attached printer.  Bear in mind that portable breathalyzers still come with a wide range of problems that simply adding a printer will not solve.

If the state does try to use a portable breathalyzer against you, you may be able to hire an expert witness to shed doubt on the reliability of that evidence.  Portable breathalyzers can notoriously pick up mouth alcohol (such as a liquor that might stick to your teeth), and they also can be radically thrown off if you blow too hard into them.

While an expert is expensive, the potential personal and professional perils of picking up a DUI conviction may well outweigh the cost.  An expert does not automatically mean that a judge or jury will disregard a portable breathalyzer, but an expert may still make a dramatic difference in the outcome of your trial.

If you have been charged with a DUI or similar offense, contact an experienced attorney immediately.  An attorney can review your case for its best possible defense.  As with most crimes, the state must prove all the elements beyond a reasonable doubt.  An experienced DUI attorney may be able to show that the state’s evidence is shakier than they would like a judge or jury to believe.

If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com.

(Besides Skokie, Matt Keenan also serves the communities of Arlington Heights, Chicago, Deerfield, Des Plaines, Evanston, Glenview, Morton Grove, Mount Prospect, Niles, Northbrook, Park Ridge, Rolling Meadows, Wilmette and Winnetka.)

You were stopped for speeding after leaving a wedding early in the morning.  You had already had a very long day, and you did have a few drinks at the wedding.  Because of your red eyes and odor of alcohol, the officer arrested you for DUI.

Are you more likely to be found guilty because of bloodshot eyes?

While police officers typically take note of glassy, bloodshot eyes, the impact of such evidence is often limited. Bloodshot eyes may help persuade a judge that you had too much to drink, but they are only a small part of the picture.

There are a variety of reasons other than alcohol that could result in bloodshot eyes:  Do you smoke cigarettes?  Did you recently spend time with friends who did?  Are you on medication? Do you habitually work around chemicals?  Do your eyes tend to redness over the course of the day? Remember, in order to convict you, the state must prove all the elements of DUI beyond a reasonable doubt. If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, an experienced attorney may be able to shed doubt on the state’s case.

If you have questions about this or another related Illinois criminal or traffic matter, please contact Matt Keenan at 847-568-0160 or email matt@mattkeenanlaw.com.

(Besides Skokie, Matt Keenan also serves the communities of Arlington Heights, Chicago, Deerfield, Des Plaines, Evanston, Glenview, Morton Grove, Mount Prospect, Niles, Northbrook, Park Ridge, Rolling Meadows, Wilmette and Winnetka.)